Detection and diagnosis of posterior circulation calcification: An interobserver agreement study.

Background: Posterior cerebral ischemic stroke and its underlying causes can be easily misdiagnosed in routine practice. Therefore, more than a third of positive cases can be easily missed during routine CT image reporting unless expert neuroimaging radiologists carefully report it. Objective: To assess the inter-rater agreement level between senior residents and general radiologists and a specialized expert neuroradiologist when detecting and diagnosing posterior cerebral circulation calcification. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study. A total of fifteen senior radiology residents (SRRs) and fifteen general radiologists (GRs) at four different hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were included in the study. A total of four CT-scanned brain cases with the presence of posterior circulation calcification (PCC) with different degrees of severity and one brain case with negative PCC were selected. These cases were predefined by expert neuroradiologists at our center. The cases were uploaded into the picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) at four different centers as outsider cases. These cases were then randomly assigned to the participating SRRs and GRs for reporting. All radiologists were blinded to the findings of the cases. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using the weighted kappa coefficient of agreement (k) between the two groups. Results: The cerebral calcification misdiagnosis rate for the SRRs and GRs was > 93% for most of the positive cases. There was 1) poor inter-observer agreement between the SRRs and GRs for the detection of severe posterior cerebral calcification(PCC) in a negative stroke case (agreement for misdiagnosis, k = 0.93; correct diagnosis, k = 0.00), 2) poor inter-observer agreement for mild PCC in a negative stroke case (agreement for misdiagnosis, k = 0.93; correct diagnosis, k = 0.00), 3) moderate PCC in a positive posterior stroke case (agreement for misdiagnosis, k = 0.92; correct diagnosis, k = 0.00), and 4) poor interobserver agreement for severe PCC in a positive posterior cerebral stroke case (agreement for misdiagnosis, k = 0.846; correct diagnosis, k = 0.00). There was excellent agreement between the SRRs and GRs when reporting negative cases of PCC and stroke. Conclusion: Our study concluded that most of the SRRs and GRs missed the diagnosis of posterior cerebral calcification in the presented cases.

The incidence of deltoid tear among patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear.

Backgroun: Full-thickness rotator cuff tear is common in the older population. The incidence of traumatic deltoid tears post-surgery is well addressed. However, non-traumatic spontaneous injury is not well recognized despite a few case reports and previous studies. The aim of the study is to determine the incidence and association of deltoid tear among patients with non-traumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear using shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 271 shoulders magnetic resonance imaging examinations with full-thickness rotator cuff tear between 2012 and 2022. The analyzed variables were full-thickness rotator cuff tear size, tear grading (small, medium, large, and massive), muscle fatty degeneration, and deltoid tear. Acromio-humeral interval was also recorded and analyzed on the anteroposterior projection of shoulder radiographs. Results: The incidence of deltoid tear was 7% (19 cases), encountered in eleven females (6.4%) and eight males (8%) with a mean age of 65 years. Deltoid tears were located on the right side in fifteen patients (9.4%) and on the left side in four patients (3.6%). The Man-Whitney U test indicated a significant association between deltoid tears and full-thickness rotator cuff tear, P < 0.001. The deltoid tear was more notably associated with large and massive full-thickness rotator cuff tear (16.7% and 42.3%, respectively), P < 0.001. Acromio-humeral interval showed a significant difference between the deltoid and non-deltoid cases, P = 0.045. Conclusion: The incidence and association of deltoid tears with full-thickness rotator cuff tear with no prior surgical intervention or traumatic insults were considered significant, with a positive impact of large and massive tear size and association of muscle fatty degeneration. This association is statistically significant and should be adequately evaluated by the radiologist.

Arterial diameter ratio as a reliable predictor for upper limb steal syndrome in patients with arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the association between the anastomosis diameter enlargement and steal syndrome incidence in patients with upper limb arteriovenous fistula using ratios as reliable predictors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional prospective study was conducted. A total of 49 patients with AVF hemodialysis access were recruited. Twenty-four participants with positive steal syndrome and 25 control were enrolled in the study. Anastomosis diameter, anastomosis diameter ratio, and volume flow ratio were measured ultrasonographically by two expert vascular sonographers. These clinical parameters were recorded and analyzed to assess the difference and association. Patient risk factors and steal syndrome association were emphasized. RESULTS: The study analysis indicates a strong association in the anastomosis diameter and anastomosis diameter ratio between steal and non-steal patients with a p-value ≤0.05. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the volume flow ratio in the patients with steal syndrome compared to the control group (p-value ≤0.05). There was a strong relationship between steal syndrome and the presence of peripheral arterial disease (73.9%, p = 0.001). The ICC index of absolute agreement between the two observers was ICC= 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-0.99, n = 10), indicating excellent agreement between observers. CONCLUSION: Anastomosis diameter and volume flow ratio strongly suggest that steal syndrome is associated with the increased diameter of anastomosis. Patients with a≥1.05 anastomosis diameter ratio have a greater risk of developing steal syndrome than those with an anastomosis ratio of ≤0.8. In addition, patients with a volume flow ratio ≥0.98 have an increased risk of developing steal syndrome than those with a volume flow ratio of ≤0.75.

Assessment of Patient Knowledge Level Towards MRI Safety Before the Scanning in Saudi Arabia.

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important diagnostic method in modern clinical medicine. Patients' knowledge about MRI is of utmost importance for optimizing the workflow, safety, and patient comfort and saving valuable time for the MRI department. This study investigates patient knowledge levels regarding MRI safety before an MRI examination. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 200 patients who required MRI. Recruitment occurred over eight weeks in governmental and private hospitals in Saudi Arabia; both hospitals and participants were selected randomly. The questionnaire was given to the patients prior to their MRI scans. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were performed to identify relationships between knowledge of MRI safety and selected demographic groupings (age, gender, education level, income level). It also evaluates their source of information and assesses the patient's previous experience regarding MRI scans. . Results: The study sample consisted of 200 patients from 230 surveys distributed in Saudi Arabia, and the response rate was ~ 87%. Depending on the P-values of the chi-square statistical test to find the relationship between socio-demographic factors and patient' knowledge level, the results showed a significant association (p-value=0.006) between age and gender and the level of knowledge relating to MRI safety issues. A similar significance (p-value=0.042) is observed between the knowledge level of patients and their educational level and annual income. In addition, a highly significant association (p-value<0.001) is found between education level or previous experience and whether people seek information about MRI safety. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that a complex combination of factors affects patient knowledge regarding MRI safety before an MRI examination. Hence, the hospital and radiological department must provide the patient with accurate information about MRI. .

Prevalence of elastofibroma dorsi found incidentally upon chest computed tomography scan: A tertiary care center experience.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and demographic data regarding incidentally encountered elastofibroma dorsi (EFD) in the Saudi population-based on chest CT (computed tomography) scans. METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out on 4,435 chest CT examinations that were collected between January 2014 and December 2016 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. One musculoskeletal radiologist who was unaware of the patients' clinical presentations or reasons for CT study reviewed the 4,435 chest CTs prospectively, searching for soft tissue tumors in the subscapular region. RESULTS: Elastofibroma dorsi was incidentally confirmed via CT scan in 36 of the 4,435 patients, including 8 males and 28 females, with a mean age of 76.6 years, yielding a prevalence of 0.8%. Elastofibroma dorsi was more common in females, with a 3.3-fold higher prevalence (77.8%) as compared to males (22.2%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Twenty-five (69.44%) patients had unilateral EFD and 11 (30.56%) had bilateral EFD. Right-sided EFD was encountered in 60% of females and 50% of males. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant correlation between the size of EFD and the patient's gender or age (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Elastofibroma dorsi is a rare but uncommon incidental finding on routine chest CT examination encountered in 0.8% of elderly Saudi patients.

Abdominal aorta measurements by a handheld ultrasound device compared with a conventional cart-based ultrasound machine.

BACKGROUND: Ultraportable or pocket handheld ultrasound devices (HUD) may be useful for large-scale abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. However, the reproducibility of measurements has not been compared with conventional cart-based ultrasound machines. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of a HUD compared with a conventional ultrasound machine for aortic screening. DESIGN: Analytical, cross-sectional. SETTING: Ultrasound department at a large tertiary care hospital in Riyadh. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible male participants aged ≥60 years were invited to participate upon arriving for a non-vascular ultrasound appointment. Three repeated anteroposterior measurements of the transverse aorta were made at the proximal and distal locations for each machine before repeating the measurements on a subset of participants by a second blinded operator. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyze reproducibility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Inter-system and intra- and inter-operator ICCs. SAMPLE SIZE: 114 males with repeated measurements by second operator on a subset of 35 participants. RESULTS: The median age (interquartile range) of participants was 68 years (62-74 years). The intra- and inter-operator ICCs were all >0.800 showing almost perfect agreement except for the inter-operator reproducibility at the proximal location using a conventional machine (ICC= 0.583, P=.007) and the Butterfly device (ICC=0.467, P=.037). The inter-system ICCs (95% CI) were 0.818 (0.736-0.874) and 0.879 (0.799-0.924) at the proximal and distal locations, respectively. The mean difference in aortic measurement between the ultrasound systems was 0.3 mm (1.7%) in the proximal location and 0.6 mm (3.6%) in the distal location. In total, >91% of the difference in measurements between the machines was <3 mm. The mean scanning time was 4:16 minutes for the conventional system and 3:53 minutes for the HUD (P=.34). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal aortic screening using a HUD was feasible and reliable compared with a conventional ultrasound machine. A pocket HUD should be considered for large-scale screening. LIMITATIONS: No cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the sample and lack of blinding. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Predictive value and reference ranges of anogenital distance for determining fetal gender in the first trimester: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of sonographically measured anogenital distance (AGD) in predicting fetal gender in Saudi fetuses during the first trimester and to provide normal reference centiles for AGD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between November 2020 and May 2021. The ultrasound scans of 313 singleton pregnancies between 11-13 plus 6 gestational weeks and their gender-at-birth were collected. Anogenital distance was measured from the inferior base of the genital tubercle to the rump. Binominal logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) evaluated the predictive performance of AGD for determining fetal gender. RESULTS: There was a significant difference of approximately 15% in mean AGD between female (5.92 mm [95% CI= 6.70, 6.14]) and male (6.80 mm [95% CI= 6.61,7.00]) fetuses (p<0.001). Anogenital distance significantly correlated with gestational age (r=0.573, p<0.001) and crown-rump length (r=0.562, p<0.001). The logistic regression determined AGD as a significant predictor of fetal gender (p<0.001). However, ROC analysis showed that overall accuracies were low at 68% (p=0.001) for 11 weeks, 70% (p<0.001) for 12 weeks, and 64% (p=0.017), and for 13 weeks. The average AGD of our Saudi cohort was longer than what the literature reported from other populations. CONCLUSION: The first-trimester ultrasound evaluation of AGD was feasible and reliable. It showed a difference between the genders but did not yield high predictive accuracy. Future research should consider racial factors when evaluating AGD.